Thursday, May 1, 2025

Partners: Forensic Genealogy & Neuropsychology

 

In 2023, I joined a groundbreaking think tank exploring the intersection of forensic genealogy and neuropsychology. How do these two distinct fields work together to solve complex cases and to better understand human behavior?

            

 Early clinical, neuropsychological and imaging findings
                     Brain, Volume 123, Issue 5, May 2000, Pages 975–991
Brain

Forensic Genealogy has revolutionized how we uncover identities, solve mysteries, and tell forgotten stories. 

Neuropsychology, on the other hand, focuses on the brain’s relationship to behavior and cognitive function. At first glance, these two fields may seem worlds apart.  Most people "cock" their heads with bewilderment, as to how these two displines intersect. But, in today’s world of interdisciplinary collaboration, their intersection is both natural and necessary.

By combining the precision of DNA science analyzed by forensic genealogists with the insights of brain science, we can approach forensic challenges with greater sensitivity, accuracy, and humanity. It's not just about solving puzzles; it's about doing so in a way that honors people and the families affected.

Where the Fields Meet

1.  Memory and Identity:

This book connected me with one of my favorite neuropsychology cases. As mentioned, it was a think-tank. The first lesson learned as the forensic genealogist on the team was 
"Psychogenealogy is NOT Neuropsychology plus Genealogy."
 (Whatever you do, don't confuse these terminologies with neuropsychologists in the room.)

The warning was strong and repeated about 5 times in the first meeting. I kept thinking, "Are you sure?" What's with the repeated warnings? They were VERY adamant and consistent in sharing: 
Psychogenealogy is NOT Neuropsychology plus Genealogy."

It appears Psychogenealogy was too foo-foo for this group. I get it. But, I was fascinated anyway. Personally I see both the reason for the merging tendency and the fascination of both. 

Case #1: Trauma and Lost Memories
Neuropsychology helps us understand how memories are formed, stored, and sometimes lost. In forensic genealogy, especially in cases of adoption, unknown parentage, or trauma, understanding the workings of memory can offer crucial context for missing or fragmented family histories.

Imagine Maria, a 52-year-old woman searching for her birth parents. DNA testing led us to several strong matches, but Maria had very few childhood memories, and almost none from her early years in foster care.

Neuropsychology teaches us that early trauma can disrupt memory formation. Therefore, gaps in her recollections are expected. In this case, forensic genealogy leaned heavily on genetic triangulation and archival research to reconstruct her family story, while neuropsychological insights could guide therapeutic approaches to support Maria’s emotional processing of her newly uncovered history.

The forensic genealogist builds the external factual story using DNA matches, documents, and genetic triangulation to reconstruct Maria’s biological family. The neuropsychologist interprets internal cognitive patterns (e.g., why Maria doesn’t remember things, or why recalling them now causes distress).

Usually, the next question asked is: How do these two disciplines interact as a team in Case 1? 
They’re directly collaborating: the genealogist informs therapeutic work, and the neuropsychologist guides how genealogical findings are introduced. The neuropsychologist might request specific genealogical findings (like birth order, early caregivers, etc.) to fill in emotional gaps that help memory recovery or therapy.

Case #2: Trauma and Family Secrets
BBC, Aug 2024

Families often bury difficult histories. 
Let's take James, a 30-year-old man, as an example. James came to us after finding a mysterious DNA match listed as "half-sibling." His family had never mentioned another child. Digging deeper, we found that during a particularly stressful time in James’ mother's life, a period marked by severe depression,  she had placed a child for adoption.

The forensic genealogist confirmed the biological relationship and uncovered the adoption history through DNA analysis and records. Due to James' and his family's reaction when he reached out to the forensic genealogist (me), a neuropsychologist was engaged to support James' and his family's emotional reactions while the genealogist provided the verified facts.

This is part of the forensic genealogist's job. We don't just "hand over" shocking information. We may have to coordinate with a neuropsychologist to prepare the family emotionally. In James' case his mother had suppressed that time in her life. 

Case #3: Cognitive Bias and DNA Analysis
What we learned early with DNA, is the attachment people have to their "presumed" heritage. "I'm Native American."I'm Irish." "I'm German." "There's no way I'm Jewish, I was raised Catholic." Oh my, we've heard it all. So let's review the case of Robert, who believed he was Irish. His DNA results placed him with a high percentage of Eastern European ancestry. Yes, Robert struggled emotionally to accept the graphic! It didn't help that it was in March!

As genealogists, we work with data. Of course, there are theories of how biases are formed, but we look at historical documents, cultural and community influences, and political and social impacts for a sketch of our ancestors' choices. Neuropsychologists, on the other hand,  are experts at examining how cognitive biases form. 
 
In the case involving Robert,  I interpreted this new evidence through the lens of what I already believed. Our neuropsychological partner shifted my practice to better present our genealogical findings to Robert and others who were loyal to their family's "folklore." The strong suggestion was to focus on the fascinating story behind migration patterns rather than simply proving Robert was wrong. 

Whereas the forensic genealogist who identifies and documents ancestry based on genetic evidence and historical data, our neuropsychologist partner advised us on cognitive biases causing Robert's resistance. It took Robert's case to recognize the level of identity people hold due to folklore. It's real! So, instead of pushing raw facts, we integrate new information.  

Robert was eventually able to accept a new self-narrative.

Case #4. Ethical Implications in Unidentified Remains Cases
At a3Genealogy we do not work to identify "Jane Doe" or on cold cases. We are, however, familiar with neuropsychologists who have worked on these cases. 

Our forensic genealogy work is concentrated on working with lawyers, bankers, and investigative agencies. Our forensic genealogy work allows us to evaluate the accuracy of facts and to identify genealogically related holes in legal cases before the lawyers go to trial or court. 

One such case involved two sisters who wanted to prove they were fathered by an extremely wealthy man. Their mother had worked for this man's family business, and their DNA proved they were not their "father's" daughters, but DNA pointed them to this business owner. However, the family of impressive wealth smelled a "rat" and would not take a DNA test to prove or disprove they were half-siblings. We could see a family relationship using DNA, and they were connected to 2nd cousins,  but the law is explicit. The attorneys needed to prove, without a reasonable doubt, that they were fathered by the one brother who worked with their Mom (whom they suspected). The DNA cousin matches proffered was not within the constraints of the law. Any of the four brothers could have fathered the sisters. 
Note: Most jurisdictions require that inheritance rights be proven through close relatives - spouses, children, grandchildren, parents, siblings, and their descendants. 
    Forensic genealogists don't just "solve the case"; they work alongside neuropsychologists to ethically and compassionately deliver results that profoundly affect real people's lives.





    Original 27 Jun 2023
    Article Sep 2024
    Updated 1 May 2025